Film Critic says Anime Authors should have Social Responsibility
Film Critic says Anime Authors should have Social Responsibility, Author replies saying he just wants to entertain his readers
Kei Onodera is a movie critic who publishes for some sites his analysis about movies and such, and on December 30, 2021 he made the following publication about the Shirobako movie.
Shirobako is one of the most praised anime of the last years for showing how the production of an anime is done, but anyway, look what he said:
“Shirobako the movie. It was suffering because even years after TV series the way females are drawn did not got “updated”. Male characters have diverse ages and bodytypes while females must fit into some kind of standard or else their existence ends up considered null and void. This, despite being done in the opposite way of how should have been done, maybe is reflecting the atmosphere of anime industry in realistic way.”
『劇場版SHIROBAKO』、TVアニメシリーズから数年経っても女性の描き方がとくにアップデートされてなかったのがつらかった。男性キャラは年齢も体型も様々なのに、女性はある種の規格に収まらなければ存在自体がないことにされるというのが、業界の空気をむしろリアルに映し出しているのでは。 pic.twitter.com/sRcHpOddhH
— 小野寺系 / Kei Onodera (@kmovie) December 30, 2021
Then manga author Chinen Mikito, who published the manga Kamen Byoutou and Ameku Takao no Suiri Karte replied to Kei Onodera, saying the following:
“The reason male characters have different bodytypes is because they have models in real life and the characters attributes was modeled based on their attributes.
By the way There is a lot of female models for the characters and the variety goes from teens to forties.
What a shallow review.
How could an movie critic don’t grasp this basic knowledge and criticize on things unrelated to contents of the movie? I could understand if this were an amateur’s work but I don’t think this is a work of a professional.
I think Shirobako was a good work.”
SHIROBAKOの男性キャラの年齢や体型が様々なのは、実際にモデルがいて、その方々に沿ったキャラ造形にしているからです。
ちなみに女性にもかなりモデルの人物がいますし、
女性キャラクターの年齢層は10代〜40代以上とかなり幅があります。あまりにも浅い考察ですね。 https://t.co/hTJX8JCK5p pic.twitter.com/UfyoIOa2cN
— 知念実希人 小説家・医師 (@MIKITO_777) January 2, 2022
Film Critic says Anime Authors should have Social Responsibility
Kei Onodera then replied with:
“You say it’s “unrelated to the movie” but you are nether thinking how the character design and the settings/lore of the character will be intertwined with the society in real life nor how works made like that will affect the society. You, as a creator/writer, you have next to no sense of responsibility on things like that.”
「作品の内容とは関係ない」と言ってるけど、キャラクターデザインや設定が現実の社会とどう絡み合っているのか、そうやってできた作品が社会にどう影響するのかについて、全く考えていない。作り手としてそういう部分に対する責任感が希薄すぎる。 https://t.co/zvGFYZwGJy
— 小野寺系 / Kei Onodera (@kmovie) January 2, 2022
Then another author decided to answer Kei Onodera, and in this case it was the author Satsuki Kitazato:
“As a creator you have next to no sense of responsibility over things like that.”
Sorry but I never think about that.
I wrote mystery stories to make readers have fun.
I have no objective of fixing the society problem or stuff like that.
I think works written to influence society are scholarly papers or academic papers.
The ones made to share scientific knowledge and have profit with it.”
「作品が社会にどう影響するか全くかんがえていない」
すいませんが全く考えていないです。
ミステリー小説は読者に楽しんでもらうために書きます。
社会問題を是正する目的なないです。社会に影響を与えるために書くのは論文などだと思います。
科学的知識を共有し、利益を得るなどの目的です。 https://t.co/Tvkx9xGZZu— 北里紗月 小説家・臨床検査技師・胚培養士 (@kitazatosatuki) January 2, 2022
What do you think about this?
Source: Privatter
Você Sabia Anime is a site originally in Brazilian Portuguese, this post is an automatic translation, if you have suggestions for improvement send us an e-mail to [email protected]
Thank you.